Why founders trust this sequence
- 3 touches
- Intro, follow-up, breakup
- 1,000+
- Funded raises analyzed
- 12
- Languages supported
- Free
- No credit card required
One email rarely gets a reply. Tell us your raise and we draft the full sequence: a tight intro, a value-add follow-up, and a breakup email, ready to send from your own inbox.
Built on patterns from 1,000+ funded raises. Sends from your own Gmail for real deliverability. 12 languages.
Created by founders from top global accelerators
Three steps. Three emails. One reply that starts the round.
Stage, ask, and a bit of traction. That is enough to draft all three emails.
Intro, follow-up, and breakup, tuned to what gets replies from investors at your stage. Each email builds on the last.
Copy them into Gmail or use Round+ to send from your own inbox, personalize per investor, and auto-stop the sequence when someone replies.
This is what a seed founder sends to each investor. Sign up to generate yours, personalized per fund.
Subject with your stage, ask, and strongest metric. Two sentences: what you do and the traction. One specific reason you emailed THIS investor. A clear ask for a 20-minute call. Under 120 words.
Short, no guilt. Adds one new proof point since the first email (a new customer, a metric, a milestone). Re-states the ask. Reminds them why the fit is specific to their thesis.
The highest-reply email of the three. Polite and final: closing the round soon, one last look. Creates urgency without pressure. Often gets the reply the first two did not.
Sign up to generate your full sequence, personalized to each investor, ready to send and track.
Most founders send one email and give up. Four reasons the sequence wins.
Investors are busy, not uninterested. Your first email gets buried. The follow-up and breakup are what actually surface a reply. Founders who send one email and stop leave most of their meetings on the table.
The third email, the polite closing-soon last look, often outperforms the intro. Scarcity works. An investor who ignored two emails will reply to avoid missing a round that is filling up.
Blasting from a mass-email tool's shared IP lands you in spam and burns your name. Sending from your own Gmail keeps deliverability high and the email personal. This is why we send from your inbox, not ours.
Nothing kills a warm lead like a follow-up that fires after they already replied. Automate the stop. On Round+ the sequence halts automatically the moment an investor responds.
Those are generic sales-outreach tools you have to configure for fundraising, and blasting from their shared infrastructure hurts deliverability. This is built for a raise: the sequence, the timing, and the copy are tuned for investors, and it sends from your own Gmail so it lands in the inbox.
Those focus on the investor list. We give you the personalized 3-touch sequence AND send it from your own inbox with reply tracking, so the whole outreach loop lives in one place, from draft to reply to pipeline.
Yes, when it is tight and personal. Warm intros are better if you have them, but most founders outside SF do not. A specific, well-sequenced cold email gets a 5 to 15 percent reply rate. A generic one-off gets close to zero. The sequence is what makes cold work.
Not if you send from your own Gmail, which is what we recommend and what Round+ does. Mass-email tools that blast from shared IPs land in spam. Sending a small volume of personalized emails from your real inbox keeps deliverability high.
Generating the sequence is free. Round+, our paid product, sends it from your own Gmail to a list of matched investors, personalizes each one, tracks opens and replies, and auto-stops when someone responds. You do not need it to get the drafts.
Sequence ready. Now line up the targets.
Round Funded
Round Funded matches you with active investors, writes the full sequence, sends it from your Gmail, and tracks every reply in one pipeline.